Monday, January 6, 2014

Physiology behind EKG effects of hypokalemia and hyperkalemia

In terms of myocardium cell potential:
hyperkalemia = depolarized resting potential, but Decreased excitability.
hypokalemia = hyperpolarized resting potential, but Increased excitability

In terms of EKG surface potential:
hyperkalemia = mixed unreliable effects on QT (shortened -> prolonged with worsening hyperK; see discussion in comments below), peaked T wave, wide QRS, ST depression
hypokalemia = prolonged QT, flat Twaves, U waves

The confusion comes from the fact that these action potentials are a lot more complicated than what there is time to cover in most Physiology courses.  Sorry for the long post below but it is necessary if you don't want to memorize the above and want to answer these "why" questions.

3 important concepts:


1) Some Na Channels will begin opening while the RMP is below "threshold potential".

Threshold voltage of a cell is not a fixed magical voltage level where all of the sodium channels suddenly turn on.  Sodium channels are voltage-gated and turn on probabilistically.  The more positive the membrane voltage, the higher the probability a sodium channel opens.  So even at very negative voltages, most sodium channels stay closed but occasionally a sodium channel may open briefly.  These brief openings conduct such a small current that they have very little effect on the RMP.  At these very negative RMP values, the only channels that are open significantly are "leak" K channels and thus the RMP (which is kind of a weighted average of the reversal potentials of all the conducting ions) remains close to the K reversal potential.  Now the (maybe to some) surprising part: if the membrane voltage depolarizes a little bit but is still significantly below (more negative to) normal "threshold potential" of a cell, some Na channels will start opening (although most stay closed). Again this is because Na channels are probabilistic and voltage dependent and start opening as the membrane starts to depolarize, long before you get to "threshold".  Since your membrane voltage has depolarized some, the probability of Na channels opening is no longer close to 0 and some of them will start opening (even though you are below "threshold").


2) Threshold voltage is kind of a moving target that depends on the size of Na and K currents relative to each other.

At sub-threshold depolarizations of membrane voltage, the opening of some Na channels does pull the membrane voltage higher (depolarizes) but as long as there is significant leak K current pulling the membrane voltage towards hyperpolarization, the Na current is sufficiently offset by the K current and the membrane voltage remains "sub-threshold".  The "threshold" phenomenon occurs when membrane voltage is elevated enough that a large enough number of Na channels open to overcome the K channels.  The membrane voltage is like a weighted average so as Na channels open, voltage is pulled towards the Na reversal potential (positive) from its resting state close to the K reversal potential (negative).  If enough Na channels open to overcome the hyperpolarizing influence of the K channels, the effect becomes a positive feedback loop: as Na channels open, the membrane voltage becomes more positive and as it becomes more positive, more Na channels open.  This Na channel positive feedback causes the rapid phase 0 depolarization of the action potential.  It would run away unchecked if not for the fast inactivation of Na channels and a second set of K channels the voltage gated K channels (as opposed to the leak K channels).  These K channels' voltage dependence is shifted more positive compared to the voltage gated Na channels and so they turn on later at more positive voltages, helping to drive membrane potential back to ward the negative reversal potential of K.


3) Sodium channels inactivate after opening.

In activation is a process that makes Na channels non-conducting after being open.  We talked about fast inactivation of Na channels (ball and chain mechanism).  There is also a slow inactivation (due to more overall conformational change of the Na channel protein).  Hyperpolarization relieves inactivation and resets the Na channels making them ready to fire.  At depolarized voltages, Na channels can open and some can go on to become inactivated.  This effect is key to the physiological effects of hyper/hypo-kalemia.


What happens in Hyperkalemia:

Reversal potential of K is shifted positive. Driving force for K to leave the cell via Leak K channels is decreased so there is less "leak" K current and the RMP is depolarized compared to normal.  The more positive RMP means more Na channels will randomly open and more of them will become inactivated.  This means fewer Na channels are available to respond by opening when full depolarization occurs.  This effectively ALSO RAISES THE THRESHOLD POTENTIAL.  Because there are fewer Na channels available to conduct current, you need a greater voltage to get enough Na current to overcome the effect of the K channels.  Thus the "threshold" voltage, the voltage where Na wins over K, is now higher.  Early in mild hyperkalemia, the effect on K currents and RMP is more important than the effect on Na channels and Threshold potential, so overall there is a small increase in excitability as the RMP is slightly closer to threshold potential.  Soon however, the hyperkalemia's effect on the Na channel inactivation dominates and you get an overall DECREASE in excitability due to decreased availability of Na channels for phase 0.  This results in a slow phase 0 depolarization and a slow or widened QRS complex. To reiterate, significant hyperkalemia will cause decreased excitability.


What happens in Hypokalemia:

Essentially reverse of above.  Low serum K = shift negative in reversal potential of K = increased K driving force = more leak K current and hyperpolarized RMP.  This causes increased availability of Na channels for firing due to relief of inactivation and actually shifts threshold potential towards the negative.  Thus there is NOT an increase in the "distance" of the RMP from threshold.  Increased Na channels = faster depolarization and lower threshold voltage = INCREASED excitability.


Effect on T-waves:

The flat/peaked T-waves are a little more complex: the voltage dependent K channel proteins (as opposed to the leak K channels which are simpler) like to have a potassium ion sitting in the pore near the extracellular end of the channel.  This helps keep them conducting and prevents them from collapsing shut.  In hypokalemia, there is decreased extracellular K, so more of the voltage gated K channels are collapsed shut.  In hyperkalemia, very few of these voltage gated K channels are collapsed and many more of them are ready to fire when the cell depolarizes sufficiently.  Thus in hyperkalemia, more K current after depolarization (ie after phase 0, so during phase 2 and 3) means, phase 2 is shortened and phase 3 is faster.  This results in shortened APD, shortened QT and peaked T wave.  Opposite in hypokalemia - collapsed K channels = less K current in phase 2 and 3 = long phase 2 and slow phase 3 = prolonged QT and flat T wave.


SA node: 

HR changes are not a typically discussed as part of the cardiac syndrome caused by hyper/hypo kalemia. Take the following with a grain of salt. This is what makes sense but really it is much more complex than our discussion. 
I did want to mention regarding atrial phase 4 depolarization that although a Sodium current is involved and K currents also become important in phase 4 (directly and in response to Acetylcholine) the channels involved are different in terms of both the Na and K channels than those mentioned earlier so do not confuse them. Phase 4 is a balance of Na and K currents where there is normally enough Na current to slowly overcome the K current and depolarize to threshold. These SA node phase 4 Na channels open at much lower voltages (are in fact hyperpolarization activated sodium channels...very different) and have a very different voltage dependence than the phase 0 Na channels. Here the important K channels are also different but similar to some of the potassium channels listed above, they also like to have a potassium ion near the extracellular pore to keep them from collapsing shut. Thus their activity is also directly affected by the presence of extracellular potassium acting directly on the channel protein conformation independent of the "driving force" effect. Therefore the conductance of potassium falls with hypokalemia even though the concentration gradient is increasing. The effect on conductance is greater than the effect on the driving force and the net effect is less potassium current and FASTER phase 4 depolarization leading to faster heartrate. The Na channels in the SA node DO NOT INACTIVATE with slow inactivation at subthreshold voltages and thus we don't have to worry about them the way we did before. Hyperkalemia would do the opposite, more K channels conducting current which fights the outward sodium current and therefore slows down phase 4 depolarization and therefore slows down heartrate. 

Interestingly, Acetylcholine (from vagus nerve endings) acts to activate an additional class of atrial potassium channels which are activated by ACh and these additional K channels can boost the potassium current to hyperpolarize the SA node and slow down phase 4 leading to the chronotropic (HR slowing) effect of the vagus nerve. 



Weakness:
In terms of weakness, some hand waving is necessary.  Decreased excitability will obviously present as weakness but increased excitablity can also cause weakness through "fatigue"-type effects.  Furthermore, the K changes will have myriad changes on other ion transporters directly and indirectly by changing other ionic gradients. Both hyper and hypo kalemia cause problems in conduction. You need correct amount of K for conduction, not excessive nor too little (that is why they both cause pathological ECG changes). The discussion above is for myocardium and EKG findings.  Behavior may be somewhat different for nerve and skeletal muscle.


46 comments:

  1. Why doesn't hypernatremia affect RMP?
    Increased sodium could repel potassium and therefore affect RMP by affecting potassium current.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great question! First, I'm going to reiterate the concept of RMP, and then I will specifically answer your scenario. Think of RMP as a "weighted average" of the reversal potentials (given by Nernst eqn) of the permeant ions; the weighting is determined by just how permeant each ion is (ie how high the conductance of that ion is at rest). So at resting membrane, there is mostly only a potassium conductance (thanks to the K+ leak channels) compared to other ions such as Na, Ca, Mg etc and therefore the RMP is close to the reversal potential of potassium (ie potassium has the most weighting). Changing the Na concentration does not have much of an effect on RMP because Na channels are mostly closed at rest so the changes in Na concentration which would change the reversal potential of Na is not really reflected in the RMP because the Na reversal potential carries such little weight in the RMP. Closed Na channels = little ability of Na to effect RMP.

      If I'm understanding your question correctly, you're wondering why the "extra" sodium ions (postitively charged) in the blood during hypernatremia interact with potassium ions (also positively charged) to affect the potassium current perhaps by repelling the potassium ions on in the blood and increasing their drive inwards? This is a very good question and one that is often swept under the rug. Just remember the law of macroscopic electroneutrality. All macroscopic amounts (more than a few molecules/atoms) of fluid in any compartment will average out to be electroneutral. Your blood does not become "more positive" during hypernatremia. That extra sodium is always accompanied by chloride or another anion. So for every sodium ion pushing a potassium ion across the membrane, there is a chloride or other anion pulling on a potassium ion and preventing it from diffusing across. There is no such thing as a "positive" solution consisting of just positively (or negatively for that matter) charged ions. In macroscopic amounts, all solutions are neutral. Hope that helps!

      Delete
  2. amazing explanation...loved it
    please continue your work

    do a post about acid base disturbances in future if possible
    thnaks alot

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Gurpartap, glad you found it helpful. Acid base is pretty huge topic encompassing respiratory, renal, and vascular physiology. Let me know if you think of a specific question within the topic.

      Delete
  3. The two statements at the beginning on the post say:
    hyperkalemia on ECG shows as long QT interval. In the explanation it says hyperkalemia causes a shorter phase 2 and shorter phase 3 repolarization, hence short QT interval. There are two contradicting statements in the same post.
    From the concept I have, hyperkalemia shortens the QT interval in addition to peaked T waves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great catch Nasha, I have corrected the text up top to make my wording less confusing. The explanatory text in the paragraph was correct. I had considered leaving out the QT part altogether as it is not a great/reliable sign for potassium concentration changes but it seems to come up often in questions so I left it in. Anyways, everything should be consistent now.

      Delete
    2. The "In terms of EKG surface potential" section at the top has the QT information backwards. Hyperkalemia has shortened QT [1] and hypokalemia has prolonged QT [2].

      Likewise, the last sentence of the "Effect on T-waves" section should say:
      Opposite in hypokalemia - collapsed K channels = less K current in phase 2 and 3 = long phase 2 and slow phase 3 = prolonged QT and flat T wave.

      Sources:
      [1] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1413606/
      [2] http://www.uptodate.com/contents/acquired-long-qt-syndrome

      Delete
    3. Corrected as mentioned in reply to Nasha's post. Thanks for pointing out the other sentence needing correction as well. (Both hyper and hypo kalemia were listed as causing prolonged QT which makes no sense)

      Delete
    4. Great post and explanation. You mentioned in your reply to Raj that "Both hyper and hypokalemia were listed as causing prolonged QT which makes no sense", however many sources list prolonged QT interval as a consequence of both hyper and hypokaelaemia.

      In hyperkalaemia, following initial T wave peaks, the PR interval is prolonged and in moderate cases absence p waves, which lead to broad QRS merging with a T wave (sine wave) and thus QT prolongation.
      In hypokalaemia, flattened T waves prolong ST-T segment and thus overall QT prolongation.
      Would be great if this could be further explained if not already done so.
      May I also ask if you have a similar post for hypo and hypercalcaemia?
      Thanks in advance!

      Delete
    5. Hi, yes your point is valid. This is why I probably should have left out QT interval discussion entirely from the hyperkalemia effect because it is not a typical or reliable indicator of hyperkalemia. In Hypokalemia, the QT is prolonged reliably. It depends on what you are interpreting the QT interval as reflecting. If you take the traditional interpretation of QT (in the setting of a normally narrow QRS) as a reflection of ventricular repolarization time then shortened QT and peaked T waves due to K channel effects in early hyperkalemia makes sense. But severe hyperkalemia will start to have effects on sodium channels too and start to prolong QRS as you mentioned. This QRS prolongation doesn't really reflect ventricular repolarization but is in fact included in the QT interval so any prolongation of QRS will contribute to prolongation of QT. If your QRS gets prolonged enough then yes it will cancel out the "traditional" QT shortening and lead to overall prolonged QT due to prolonged QRS. I'll change the top line header summary to reflect this mixed picture.

      A couple helpful references (selected biased to support my points):
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627796/

      https://pearls4peers.com/2015/08/06/is-the-qtc-interval-an-accurate-reflection-of-myocardial-repolarization-time-in-ventricular-conduction-defects-associated-with-a-widened-qrs-complex/

      Finally a legit reference appeared which gives a very detailed (way beyond the scope of my blog post) explanation but I think is mostly consistent with what I've laid out above. They (appropriately) focus on arrythmogenesis, not specific ECG intervals:
      https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004667

      Delete
    6. One more:
      https://www.mdmag.com/medical-news/electrophysiologic_basis

      Delete
  4. There was something that one of my teachers said these days, that hypokalemia does prolong the QT interval, but he said there was something to do with Ca++ channels, being influenced by K+ channels, which would determine sequestraion of Ca++ in the sarcoplasmic reticulum and thus prolong QT interval. I had no idea what he meant and I'm still trying to figure it out. Would you please help with this one ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oh man this is going to get complicated. Even if my explanation above appears complex it is still vastly oversimplified and does not begin to caputure all the important players. Cardiac electrophysiology is a field unto itself and you could devote your life to it and still have plenty of nagging questions left.

      Calcium has been left out of the discussion above entirely even though it plays an important role in cardiac action potential and therefore in the EKG. L-type calcium channels allow calcium influx during the phase 2 plateau of the action potential and therefore changes in calcium currents can also affect QT interval etc. Besides L-type calcium channels there is also the Na-Ca exchanger which depends on the Na/K ATPase activity to power itself. Finally, there are such things as calcium regulated K channels but these are more prominent in vascular physiology are not known to be important players in cardiac action potentials. None of these mechanisms interact with hypokalemia to cause prolongation of QTc as far as I'm aware.

      There are interactions with Potassium and Calcium but I don't think they are the primary drivers of QT changes seen in hypokalemia. For example, the drug digoxin antagonizes the effect of the Na/K pump. This decreased Na/K pump activity interferes with the Na/Ca exchanger function since it is entirely dependent on the Na gradient. This leads to increased intracellular Calcium which can cause premature closure (calcium dependent inactivation) of L-type calcium channels and thus cause shortened APD and shortened QRS interval (which is what you see with digoxin effect on EKG).

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. hello could you please explain to me about the duration of action potential in hyperkalaemia? my understanding is that if the cells are less excitable, the duration of action potential should be longer? no? thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please see section on "Effect on T-waves" where action potential duration (abbreviated as APD in the text) is discussed briefly. Excitability has to do with the ease of Sodium channel activity to overcome leak potassium channel activity. It is not directly related to APD in any clear way. To remember the effect, just think APD correlates with QT interval (ie shorter in hyperkalemia and opposite in hypokalemia).

      Delete
  7. Great article - can you give me a source for your statements about threshold potential and resting potential not being further apart in hypokalemia? I haven't been able to find a discussion of that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't have a specific reference but please see my reply to yseok's comment below.

      Delete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Could u please post about u waves in ecg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great question. I had to go look this one up and it doesn't seem like the question is quite settled. see: "Early Afterdepolarizations, U Waves, and Torsades de Pointes" Wu et al Circulation 2002. However all the theories do seem related to prolonged or delayed repolarization of some debatable part of the myocardium or conduction system. This jives with our discussion above about hypokalemia causing prolonged repolarization ("Effect on T-waves" section above).

      Delete
  10. is there any reference about your explanation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't provide references for everything stated but you are welcome to verify my claims and challenge anything which seems questionable. This is mostly a synthesis of things I have learned over the years in Medical school and during my PhD in electrophysiology/biophysics. There are a lot of points made and each would require a scientific reference.

      For broad strokes:
      "Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes" by Hille (textbook) gives great background (channel inactivation mechanisms etc). Another useful paper was: "Hyperkalemia revisited" by Parham et al in 2006.

      Thanks for your interest.

      Delete
  11. 21/2 years later and this is still helping people. Thanks for posting it!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. thaaaaaaaaank uuuuu. it helped me a lot

    ReplyDelete
  13. Excuse me but I don't understand what is RMP stand for ?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wonderful post..answered so many of my doubts...thank you so much

    ReplyDelete
  15. In mild hyperkalemia , t wave ie vent repolarization the slope of phase 3 increases that is compensatory more opening of voltage gated k ion chanels ie more effux of k ion . Does this mean that there is more conductance of current and leading to tall T waves in mild hyperkalemia ???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This happens any kind of hyperkalemia. I wouldn't focus on the "mild" part which is only relevant for effects on phase 0. The effect on phase 3 and on T-waves you are referring to happens for all hyperkalemia and its severity will vary directly with the degree of hyperkalemia.

      Delete
  16. Can you comment on the cardiac conductivity part? Conductivity is dependent on phase 0 of action potential. But in different books I have found that both hypo /hyper decreases conductivity!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting question. From what I also found, both hyper- and hypo- kalemia decrease conductivity. The hyperkalemia effect would seem easier to explain due to effects on phase 0 and excitability already discussed above (just applied to purkinje/conduction system). Hypokalemia is harder because it otherwise appears to increase excitability. My best guess is hypokalemia effects on conductivity are due to its effect on AV node (similar to what is discussed in the heart rate/SA node section above). Because sodium channels are not involved in phase 0 of SA and AV nodes, hypokalemia does not exert effects on sodium channel inactivation and phase 0 as it does elsewhere. it does affect AV node phase 3 and phase 4 due to increased potassium flux leading to slowed phase 4 depolarization and slowed conduction. Thats the best I can come up with but this is not from a cited source. Let me know if you find a better explanation elsewhere. Thanks.

      Delete
  17. Bro all that stuff is speechless .....i have not commented on any post to date ....But u r a magician ... u dragged me into all that .... wonderful wonderful wonderful wonderful man.... its just extra-ordinary <3

    ReplyDelete
  18. Great note many thanks ..my question is in hypokalemia we have a wide QRS but according to what you said we shoulfld have a narrow QRS cuz when we reach the threshold we have a plenty of excited Na channels so the cell must reach the depolarization potential quickly and that gives a narrow QRS ..please clarify this point if possible tlanf thanks again

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Any QRS widening seen in hypokalemia is "apparent" widening because of U waves overlapping with the QRS. There isn't true widening of the QRS on a physiologic level. The true physiologically dangerous QRS widening happens with HYPERkalemia and can progress to sinusoidal appearing ECG and torsades. The mechanism of QRS widening in hyperkalemia is given above. Great question.

      Delete
  19. Sir, this is an excellent explaination. But in many books and online sources i found that hypokalemia increases the slope of phase 4 depolarisation and the pacemaker rhythmicity and vice versa for hyperkalemia.sir, can u please explain this

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sigh... keeping me humble! You make an excellent point, Kavit and I have updated the section on "SA Node" which attempts to explain this. I had warned about taking it with a grain of salt and I'm glad you've pointed out the obvious error. The Potassium channels which oppose phase 4 depolarization apparently are also sensitive to extracellular potassium concentration (ie like to have a K ion near the extracellular pore to keep them open). In hypokalemia more of these channels collapse shut and thus phase 4 occurs more steeply and HR is INCREASED (not decreased as it said before). Interestingly, Acetylcholine (from vagus nerve endings) acts to activate an additional class of atrial potassium channels which are activated by ACh and these additional K channels can boost the potassium current to hyperpolarize the cells and slow down phase 4 leading to the chronotropic (HR slowing) effect of the vagus nerve. Great catch and thanks for the comment!

      Delete
    2. Some references/resources:
      http://www.cvphysiology.com/Arrhythmias/A005
      http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2010.00835.x/full
      http://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(04)00792-1/fulltext
      http://circep.ahajournals.org/content/10/3/e004667.full
      https://www.escardio.org/Journals/E-Journal-of-Cardiology-Practice/Volume-14/First-in-a-series-on-Hyperkalemia-Hyperkalemia-the-sodium-potassium-pump-and-the-heart

      Delete
    3. Thanks a lot sir. But in the hyperkalemia and excitability part it is mentioned that hyperkalemia causes lesser driving force for leaky k+ channels and thus lesser k+ leak which contradicts the logic for sa node. Pls clarify that. Also i found in harrison text book of medicine that potassium changes affect the basic na+-k+ pump and this change in phase 4 slope is a result of the same, so does this have a role here? Thanks again

      Delete
    4. Different channels with different sensitivities to the two effects. The SA node phase 4 depolarization is not caused by the same channels as other "leak" potassium channels. The Phase 4 depolarization includes channels that are more sensitive to external K concentration (can collapse shut with hypokalemia). In the leak potassium current, this collapsing inactivation mechanism is less of an issue and there is a cleaner effect on the driving force alone making the latter effect dominate. While I'm sure the K concentration effects the electrogenic Na-K pump, I believe the phase 4 effects are dominated by direct effects on the "funny current" channels.

      Delete
  20. Hi, thank you for your great post.
    I would also like to know the hypokalemic effect on musculoskeletal systems. Clinical manifestations of hypokalemia on skeletal muscles include weakness, flaccid paralysis and decreased deep tendon reflex while it can also cause muscle cramps and (tetany?). I am confused about the mechanisms under these manifestations, since muscle cramps and weakness seems to be opposed to each other...? Does muscle become hyperexcitable or hypoexcitable during hypokalemia? Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Steven, I've included some brief notes on skeletal muscle in the original post but its a completely different system so I haven't covered it in detail. The response of any excitable tissue to changes in blood ionic concentrations is going to depend on the mix of conductances (ie ion channels or transporters) on its surface. As we've seen above, the story is usually more complicated than simply looking at the "driving force" because ions like potassium can play allosteric roles, control inactivation, recovery, and changes in membrane gradient can affect all other voltage sensitive channels and proteins on the cell surface leading to a very complicated interplay. So it all depends on whats on the surface of your cell and how those things interact. The ion channels involved on skeletal muscle are very different from the mix of channels on cardiac muscle and that is why lessons above can't necessarily directly apply to skeletal or smooth muscle or nerves etc. To try to answer your question a little better, I found a couple quick resources which seem to imply skeletal muscle is overall hyperpolarized and made less excitable by hypokalemia leading to clinical symptoms of weakness, fatiguability myalgias, cramps etc. I didn't come across tetany and agree that would be confusing. I did see that rhabdomyolysis could be a complication since increased local serum potassium around exerting muscle is a powerful signal for compensatory vasodilation which can become compromised in hypokalemia leading to skeletal muscle ischemia/rhabdo. Hope that's somewhat helpful. Cheers!

      Delete
    2. Some random resources FYI:
      http://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/8/7/1179.full.pdf
      https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/hypokalemia/

      Delete
    3. Thank you very much for your excellent explanation and the concept for this seemingly complex topic. It clears my head~ Thanks again!

      Delete